Crack Reporting
Posted: 01 Jun 2010 10:24 AM PDT
Here's a letter to the New York Times:
Dear Editor:
Suppose Uncle Sam orders you to raise by 41 percent the price you charge for subscriptions to your newspaper. Would you be surprised to find a subsequent fall in the number of subscribers? If you assigned a reporter to investigate the reasons for this decline in subscriptions, would you be impressed if that reporter files a story offering several possible explanations for the fall in subscriptions without, however, once mentioning the mandated 41 percent price hike?
Unless you answered "yes" to this last question, I wonder why you published Mickey Meece's report on today's record high teenage unemployment rate ("Job Outlook for Teenagers Worsens <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/01/business/01jobs.html?pagewanted=1&%2334&sq&st=cse&%2359;&%2359;fading%20summer%20job&scp=1> ," June 1). Between 2007 and 2009, Uncle Sam ordered teenage workers (who are mostly unskilled) to raise the price they charge for their labor services by 41 percent. (That is, the federal minimum-wage rose from $5.15 per hour in 2007 to its current level of $7.25 in 2009 - a 41 percent increase.)
Does it not strike you as more than passing strange for your reporter - assigned to help explain why teenagers today have an increasingly difficult time finding jobs - to ignore the fact that these teenagers are ordered by government to raise significantly the wages that they charge their employers?
Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
No comments:
Post a Comment